On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> You mean that you made many attempts to find a blunder, but we were more > than three to show you that in each case, you were confusing 1-views and > 3-views. > That was your one and only retort in our debate, no explanation just a repeat of the mantra, you really should get a rubber stamp made of "you're confusing 1-views and 3-views". And yet I would humbly submit that there is not a single person on planet Earth who "confuses the 1-view from the 3-view"; or at least nobody this side of a looney bin. > >> a proof is built on the foundations of previous steps therefor it would > be idiotic to keep reading a proof, any proof, after a mistake has been > found. > > > This means you don't suspect errors in the sequel. Nice. > I have no idea if you made additional errors and I don't care, it doesn't matter how strong the walls of a skyscraper are if it's built on top of a mound of jello it's going to come crashing down. After an error has been made in a proof everything that follows is just gibberish. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
