On 19 Jun 2014, at 02:00, LizR wrote:
PS I must say I find step 3 an odd place to attempt to refute comp.
Presumably you've accepted the original assumptions and the first
two steps. Most people either disagree with the original
assumption(s), or go for the MGA (i.e. the "reversal" - the argument
that we don't need a physical universe). Step 3, iirc, is just the
demonstration of first person indeterminacy, which is I would think
no more contraversial here than it is in Everett.
Nice to hear this.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
