On 18 Jun 2014, at 15:26, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:41 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote
:
>> I read the first 3 steps, Bruno made blunders in step 3; a proof
is built on the foundations of previous steps therefor it would be
idiotic to keep reading a proof, any proof, after a mistake has been
found.
> That's fair enough. Obviously I missed the blunder in step 3 when
I read it - what is it?
If after saying whats wrong with Bruno's vacuous "proof" over and
over and over and over and over and over again for 3 years
You insisted indeed, but you don't seem to even realize that nobody
was convinced, or able to explain to anyone what it is, but a
confusion between 1p and 3p.
and you still ask "what is it" then what would be the point of me
repeating it yet again?
You never made it.
Bruno
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
