On 20 June 2014 06:32, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:50 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> If after saying whats wrong with Bruno's vacuous "proof" over and >>> over and over and over and over and over again for 3 years and you >>> still ask "what is it" then what would be the point of me repeating it yet >>> again? >>> >> >> > If you've said it that many time then you shouldn't have a problem >> summarising it once more. >> > > Personal pronouns. >
Ah, now something comes back to me. Is it just a question of whether the duplicates are the same "I" as the original? This is irrelevant to the argument of step 3, because that's defined using the diaries each person is supposed carry, and make notes of their experiences in. Whether they argue about who is the real successor to the original doesn't come into it, as far as I remember. Since you haven't mentioned the assignment of probabilities, I assume you don't think there's a problem with that? > Preferably you could start a new thread >> > > I'd rather eat ground glass. > Very dramatic (you aren't my 12 year old daughter under an alias, by any chance?) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
