On 19 June 2014 01:26, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:41 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote > : >> >> >> I read the first 3 steps, Bruno made blunders in step 3; a proof is >>> built on the foundations of previous steps therefor it would be idiotic to >>> keep reading a proof, any proof, after a mistake has been found. >>> >> >> > That's fair enough. Obviously I missed the blunder in step 3 when I >> read it - what is it? >> > > If after saying whats wrong with Bruno's vacuous "proof" over and over > and over and over and over and over again for 3 years and you still ask > "what is it" then what would be the point of me repeating it yet again? >
a) I haven't been around here for 3 years b) If you said it in the middle of one of those interminable exchanges which gets nested 25 levels deep and takes up about 20 screens' worth of scrolling, I may easily have missed it. c) If you've said it that many time then you shouldn't have a problem summarising it once more. Preferably you could start a new thread (and please don't leave any extra stuff from previous threads at the end of your post). Or failing that, could you at least refer me to somewhere you've said it before? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
