From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal On 04 Jul 2014, at 10:36, LizR wrote: On 4 July 2014 18:16, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: This kind of classification is fine as far as distinguishing believing god doesn't exist from failing to believe that god does exist. But it is still ambiguous because it assumes that "God(s)" is definite. I don't believe that personal agent type gods exist; but I'm on the fence about some creative principle or unnamable truths that some people would like to call "God". I believe that theist (e.g. Abrahamic) gods do not exist. I comment Brent first, here. OK. fair enough, but even if the God of the theists does not exist, he might still have important relationships with the Plotinus ONE, or even with the notion of arithmetical truth as pointed too by a machine. But doesn't "God" imply an Identity, which cannot by its very nature be all things, because Identity always is - and must be - defined in terms of a larger set; i.e. good is defined in terms of evil both within some larger set that encompasses both. The ineffable, indescribable essence is without Identity. Chris In all texts, I take what is convincing, and let what I don't understand for further reflexion. And here I comment Liz: OK. Although string theory almost certainly predicts that they exist somewhere (but not in our corner of the multiverse). Really? I doubt this. Daemon capable of imitating God might be prove to exist, in both some QM-GR theory, and in arithmetic, but for God itself, I am afraid it is more transcendent than any seemingly being in any realm. In the terrestrial (effective) realm, you can't distinguish God from the Devil. The most which can make (G*- non communicable) sense is that you eventually remember who you are, being God, or the Devil. It is the only way you might be able to differentiate them. Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
RE: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture
'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:44:22 -0700
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... Bruno Marchal
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... meekerdb
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... LizR
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... meekerdb
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... LizR
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... meekerdb
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... LizR
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... meekerdb
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... LizR
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... Bruno Marchal
- RE: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... Bruno Marchal
- RE: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... Bruno Marchal
- RE: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... meekerdb
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... Bruno Marchal
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... Bruno Marchal
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... Bruno Marchal
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... John Clark
- Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: ... Kim Jones

