On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> John Clark is NOT a "comp" believer. >> > > > This contradicts the fact that you are OK with step 0, and step 1, and > step 2. > I'm not surprised. I've long ago forgotten what those steps were but I do know that If one starts with any contradictory concept, such as "comp" for example, and starts manipulating it in a logical way there is no way it can avoid generating further contradictions. Or to put it more simply, garbage in garbage out. >> Bruno Marchal is simply asserting early in the "proof" what Bruno >> Marchal is attempting to prove. >> > > > That is always the case in deductive argument. > OK, I will now prove the Riemann hypothesis. Step 1: The Riemann hypothesis is true. Step 2: Therefore the Riemann hypothesis is true. QED John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
