Computationalism is necessarily consistent, but may not be complete except in nearly infinite domains. Richard
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16 Jul 2014, at 20:43, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> John Clark is NOT a "comp" believer. >>> >> >> > This contradicts the fact that you are OK with step 0, and step 1, and >> step 2. >> > > I'm not surprised. I've long ago forgotten what those steps were > > > This might explains your difficulty. > > > > but I do know that If one starts with any contradictory concept, such as > "comp" for example, > > > > Computationalism is contradictory? What is the contradiction? > > Bruno > > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
