Computationalism is necessarily consistent, but may not be complete except
in nearly infinite domains.
Richard


On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

>
> On 16 Jul 2014, at 20:43, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
>
> >> John Clark is NOT a "comp" believer.
>>>
>>
>> > This contradicts the fact that you are OK with step 0, and step 1, and
>> step 2.
>>
>
> I'm not surprised. I've long ago forgotten what those steps were
>
>
> This might explains your difficulty.
>
>
>
> but I do know that If one starts with any contradictory concept, such as
> "comp" for example,
>
>
>
> Computationalism is contradictory? What is the contradiction?
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to