On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Who cares, I don't give a hoot in hell about "comp".
>>
>
>
 > By definition you believe in comp,
>

If you say so, I guess you should know as you invented the word, so I guess
the definition of "comp" is "the stuff that John Clark believes".


> > but neither evoloution, nor anything 3p can prove that comp is correct,
>

Fine, so "comp" isn't correct, and since "comp" isn't correct can we please
stop talking about the stupid thing?

> so that philosophical zombies are logically conceivable.
>

Although I think its rather unlikely it is logically conceivable that I am
the only conscious being in the universe; however it is not logically
conceivable that intelligence and consciousness are unrelated and Evolution
still managed to produce one conscious being, and yet I know for a fact
that it did. Therefore philosophical zombies are logically inconceivable.

> What you mean is that you believe that there is a flaw in UDA,
>

That is not my area of expertise so I'm not competent to judge if the
Universal Dance Association is good at teaching ballet or not.

>  We know also, as we assume comp [...]
>

I don't assume your baby talk jargon or your silly homemade acronyms.

 >> before I can give you that precise answer I need to know what you mean
>> by "the H-guy". Does it mean:
>> 1) John Clark?
>> 2)  The fellow currently experiencing Helsinki?
>>
>
> > Now you regress again, and we will cycle. Just consult sane04, the step
> 3 protocol is clear and has never change since the beginning.
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHALAbstract.html
>

So rather than simply answering my question with #1 or #2 you just say the
answer, whatever the hell it is, has always been the same and then give a
link to the same long paper that is full of imprecise vague pronouns. So I
ask again, does "the H guy" refer to  #1 "John Clark", or does it refer to
#2  "the fellow currently experiencing Helsinki"?

> And yes, we know that you John Clark, will be in both city, after the
> experience is completed. But this does not answer the question, which is
> about what you expect your life will turn in.
>

Explain who Mr. You is and John Clark will answer that question.

> it will not turn into "I have the superposed experience of being in the
> two city at once".
>

Maybe, maybe not, it depends on who Mr. I is.

> You are on Earth, and you need, for some reason, to go urgently on Mars.
> Bad luck, you can't really afford the 100% secure quantum classical
> teleportation channel Earth-Mars, but you have enough money to take a
> channel where it is known that the probability of eavesdropping is 1/4.
> Now there will be two questions, according to the fact that
> the eavesdropping is destructive, or not.
>
> The eavesdropping is destructive when Eve, the "pirate", intercepts the
> message, and prevents it to attain Mars.
> The eavesdropping is non-destructive when Eve intercepts the message,
> copies it, and let it attain Mars.
>
> In both question the probability of eavesdropping is 1/4, and it is
> supposed that Eve reconstitutes you in Hell, or some bad place.
> You are on Earth, just before pushing the button. How do you evaluate your
> chance to find yourself in hell?
>
> a) with a destructive eavesdropping?
>

Don't know about Mr. You, we've never been introduced, but there is a 75%
chance  John Clark will go to Mars and a 25% chance John Clark will go to
hell; John Clark would be very reluctant to push that button even if the
odds were 100% Mars and 25% hell because hell doesn't sound like much fun.
But that's just John Clark, Bruno Marchal may feel differently and there is
no disputing matters of taste.

> b) with a non-destructive eavesdropping?
>

Then it doesn't matter if Eve intercept things or not because she doesn't
interfere and lets things proceed as originally planned, so there is a 100%
chance that John Clark will remain on Earth and a 100% chance John Clark
will go to Mars; provided that Mars is a nice place John Clark would not
hesitate in pushing that button.

  John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to