Since you're replied to a rather long message without indicating which part
you're replying to, I don't know what you think is obviously true.

On 22 September 2014 12:33, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> wrote:

> Of course it is true. But it may nobe the only kind of consciosness
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 8:24 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 22 September 2014 12:07, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:34 AM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good point Brent and one on which I am also equivocal, which is why I
>>>> have been keen to tease out whether people are talking about consciousness
>>>> or the contents of consciousness, and to try to work out whether there is,
>>>> in fact, any difference. If there isn't, consciousness becomes something
>>>> like *elan vital*, a supposed magic extra that isn't in fact necessary
>>>> in explanatory terms - all that exists are "bundles of sensations" (or
>>>> however Hume phrased it).
>>>>
>>>
>>> But in materialism we still have a magic extra: matter itself. In the
>>> MUH math is the magic extra. I don't know of any theory that gets rid of
>>> all "magic" assumptions.
>>>
>>
>> My point was that on this theory, which is basically eliminativism,
>> consciousness doesn't actually exist, in the same way as there was no
>> "special ingredient" needed to animate living matter, to distinguish it
>> from dead matter, it turned out to be "merely" a question of how the
>> constituents were organised. Similarly there *may* be no special
>> ingredient needed to turn bundles of sensations into consciousness.
>>
>> I agree that materialism has magic matter, however that isn't in itself
>> an argument against an eliminativist explanation of consciousness.
>> Otherwise it could be used as an argument for elan vital, or souls, or
>> anything else. It just means the chain of explanation doesn't appear to end
>> with matter.
>>
>> However, I don't agree that the MUH *necessarily* has magic maths, it's
>> at least possible that maths is a logical necessity. Since it's the only
>> thing we know of that couldn't be otherwise (except in very abstruse ways,
>> at least) it is at least a candidate for being fundamental, i.e. the last
>> link in the chain of explanation.
>>
>>>
>>> In reply to John's comment, we *don't* know that sure that certain
>>>> types of brain activity cause consciousness, that's a (very reasonable)
>>>> hypothesis based on the fact the two appear to be always correlated.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We don't even know if they are strongly correlated, because we don't
>>> know what else is conscious. Is an insect swarm conscious? Is your
>>> computer? Are galaxies? The problem is that we might be confusing empathy
>>> for consciousness. It is clear that the more an organism is similar to us
>>> the more empathy we feel (human > monkey > cat > insect > bacteria, ...).
>>>
>>
>> Right. Hence my use of "appear to be" above. It's very reasonable to
>> assume that consciousness requires a fairly complex central nervous system,
>> which somehow generates it - this theory isn't contradicted by any evidence
>> I know of, except perhaps for NDEs, and has quite a lot of (apparent)
>> explanatory power. That doesn't make it true, of course.
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to