what about Tegmarks' statement that consciousness is another form of matter. 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Ruquist <yann...@gmail.com>
To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Oct 4, 2014 6:53 am
Subject: Re: generalizations_of_islam


"Nobody worships matter"


But many worship nature.
I do not see much difference.
Richard



On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:55 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:

          
    
On 10/3/2014 10:20 AM, 'Chris de      Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
    
    
      
>>A        lot of evidence for some God (like the god Matter), is not a        
>>proof of its existence, still less so in front of complex open        
>>problems.
      
 
      
I          have been having a very long argument -- on another list –          
with a man whose intellect and mind I very much respect, but          who is 
irrationally attached to the notion of the god Matter.          It has gone on 
for over fifty back and forth posts and this          person – who is 
intelligent and very aware of events in the          world and in the mind… a 
man who has had deep spiritual          experiences and is someone I generally 
respect.
      
But          my questioning of the “need” for actual real stuff in the          
universe and my pointing out that fundamentally all we know          about the 
universe is information we can measure about it and          that it is 
information itself (and information processes –          i.e. computation)  
that seems to be – and arguably could be –          fundamental… it hit a brick 
wall in his brain. There is just          no budging him on it and he has 
become quite heated in his          insistence on the existence of – as you put 
it god Matter. It          keeps creeping up in the arguments he puts forth as 
a given.
      
It          is a difficult problem to even get someone to question whether      
    or not this “god Matter” is even necessary for the formulation          of 
an explanation for reality.
    
    
    Matter is something not      very well defined, even in physics.  It's 
roughly fermions.  But      fermions are thought to be excitations of a more 
fundamental      field.  That's why physicists like Max Tegmark are led to 
propose      it's math all the way down.  
      
      But it's pejorative to refer to it as "god".  Nobody worships      
matter.  Physics textbooks don't have moral prescriptions derived      from 
QED.  To call it "god" is to give into Bruno's desire to make      all 
fundamental science "theology".
      
      Brent
      


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to