On 07 Dec 2014, at 22:17, LizR wrote:

On 8 December 2014 at 01:30, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

On 06 Dec 2014, at 10:37, LizR wrote:
That's a curious question. The ruins and record indicate that there was no ancient civilisation that had anything like the knowledge or resources of modern day technology. For example, no ancient civilisation discovered the use of fossil fuels or nuclear power. One could argue that these things aren't in fact good for modern civilisation, but since we don't know how things will work out that would be presumptuous.

For the nuclear resources, I follow you. For the use of petrol (dead plants), arguments (in favor of Hemp, 'course) already mentioned that it was not sustainable, and that it would disrupt life equilibrium in the middle run (a point made already by Henry Ford).

My point is that using fossil fuels MAY have bridged the gap from preindustrial society to a sustainable postindustrial one - we don't know yet.

I think so for fossil fuels other than petrol. And we would have use living plants, we would have still used petrol, but with a means of an economical regulation based on fair or fairer competition. The problem is that once we get criminals organizing the market, we lost all the regulating factors, and the society get pyramidal in the Monty way. This leads to social crisis, and life becomes hard. In UK the number of people having food problem has gone from 200,000 to 900,000, for example. The current austerity is nonsense, but we are all hostage of bandits.




The fact is, all but the poorest people in the Western world has things that would have been unimaginable to the richest people of the ancient world. I would say that this does make our civilisation superior in important ways;

It makes us more competent, but plausibly less intelligent.

Yes, I agree that is at least possible.



I would certain prefer to be alive now than even 100 years ago.

May be. May be not. It is very hard to evaluate. There are no absolute point of comparison. People from that period might get very depressed if living in our urban cities for a while.

Yes, I have to admit I was thinking *I* would prefer it - but *I* know about life now. As someone said in a TV show once (I forget which) in which someone from the past visited the present - "So what did they bring back from the Moon? Some rocks? That doesn't sound very interesting...:"

Not talking about the food, that such time traveller would consider insipid, not even swallowable. They would not beat the heat system, because what is better than a wood fire. Then kids would be happy just seeing planes and the technology, but might understand that this does not simplify our lives, but make it more complex. Then the poor can be depressed, because we keep insulting the rich, but some poor like to dream that one day they might become rich, and that dream is forbidden today, which left no choice. Today, we want respect everybody (political correctness), and I think this would depressed most people of the past. Political correctness is a very depressing phenomenon. Take the jewish people, I am not sure they can say that there has been any progress for them all along the years, except perhaps with the creation of Israel, which might give a minute hope for the time traveller, but then we know that it is not that simple, and that the future is still not clear. Thay are still persecuted, in and out of Israel. The progresses are that we have now stupidity + technology, like bombs and the net, which for some people amplify the misery and the problems. But then after 1500 years of interdiction of theology, and imposition of the materialist christianism, it is not astonishing. We have regress on the human science, since that time, except for the birth of democracy, but they are young and already very sick today. I still hope we can progress, but as long as the lies on health, physical, mental and spiritual continue, the progress are not even on the horizon.







Indeed 100 years ago the routine gall bladder surgery I had a couple of years ago would have probably killed me (always assuming I'd survived childhood illnesses, childbirth and so on).

We are better for the survival, but we might be astonished for the quality of life, even of the poors. It is very hard to judge. We have much more depression and suicides, we have much more elderly people abandoned by their family. We have much more fake conviviality and superficial happiness. We have new fears and new subject of despair (like atomic bombs, pollution, prohibition, ...). I just mean that I am not completely persuaded that the technological progresses made us more happy. The 20th century has also been a peak of inhumanity, notably through genocide, very cruel wars, including the cold one, rise of unemployment, etc. So I am not sure, I dunno, may be we can't really answer this.

I find myself agreeing with you. I was trying to counteract the idea of a "golden age" - that the past was much better than the present.

Some past, in some place, for some people. Today, as islam and atheism (the non agnostic one) illustrates (alas) that we are at the peak of obscurantism. It is not Islam per se, nor atheism, but the fact that parrots repeating without understanding are numerous, and thinking is not welcome there (as I have personnally see with some kind of strong atheism and "free-thinker", which are more dogmatic than christians, even under inquisition).

Proportionnally, much more people can eat when hungry, but we are much more numerous also, and that more poor people starving than during all preceding period.



(Certainly I might well have died horribly in various ways in the past before reaching my present age, but even so... to automatically extrapolate from what I said to "we are therefore happier now" would be wrong.

OK. There so many factors in a human life, that it is hard to compare.

Bruno






--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to