On 08 Dec 2014, at 19:02, meekerdb wrote:

On 12/8/2014 2:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

On 07 Dec 2014, at 19:26, meekerdb wrote:

On 12/7/2014 4:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
We are better for the survival, but we might be astonished for the quality of life, even of the poors. It is very hard to judge. We have much more depression and suicides, we have much more elderly people abandoned by their family. We have much more fake conviviality and superficial happiness. We have new fears and new subject of despair (like atomic bombs, pollution, prohibition, ...). I just mean that I am not completely persuaded that the technological progresses made us more happy.

Of course there's not much depression and suicide in Syria - because there's so much grief and homicide.


Yes during war, depression and suicide go away. But I don't see the link with what I said.

My point was only that material and civil well being is what makes depression and suicide more common than grief and homicide by reducing the latter.

I am not convinced there are more suicide only because people are less often killed. I think it is more because when people are materially comfortable, the lack of the spiritual value make them interrogating the meaning of life. 2/3 of those winning big lottery prize get severely depressed, sometimes paralysed I read once.



But in any case I don't agree with some of your premises. I don' think more elderly people are abandoned by their family. I can't think of a single one in my personal experience.

You are lucky. I see only that in urban cities, and it arrives also in the countries.



Whether conviviality is fake you'll have to judge for yourself. Lincoln said, "Everybody is about as happy as they want to be."

Nice quote. The problem is in the "want".



The only reason superficial happiness is more common is because material well being provides things that were previously supposed to bring happiness - but people are still only as happy as they want to be.

Some people can be more happy dreaming about being rich, than in being rich, where indeed they eventually understand that money does not make happiness, and this shut out the possible dreams, and they get depressed. Of course money is a good tool, but when blinded spiritually, it becomes an end, and as an end it is brings only frustration.



So if you ask them if they are happy they reflect on their material well being and conclude that they should be happier than they are. So technological progress allows us a kind of equilibrium at our inherent level of happiness. Our unhappiness then is related to dissatisfaction with ourselves, worry about the future for our children, ... rather that grief and suffering and fear for our lives.

Material "well being" leads to both when the money is no more a tool but an end.

Bruno



Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to