On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> we should not separate science from religion. > We must separate shit from chocolate cake, otherwise you won't have chocolate cake, you'll just have shit. > > We can make hypothesis and reason about the nature of matter, > And the people who think studying the stresses in concrete is a religion are the same people who love the three letter word "G-O-D" but not the meaning behind it. >> The word "silly" is the only argument the "atheism is just a slight >> variation of Christianity" idea deserves. >> > > > You don't quote my argument, and you don't provide any argument. > The word "silly" is the only argument the "atheism is just a slight variation of Christianity" idea deserves. > > It is just plain obvious that by keeping theology out of rationalism, we > get irrational theology > Words have meanings, or at least they should. If it's not irrational then it's not theology. > You can define the God of PA in ZF. You can define the God of ZF in ZF + > Kappa. > And the only biped who would make such a bizarre definition would be one who loves the three letter word "G-O-D" but not the meaning behind it. > >>> most strong atheists believe in primary matter in a dogmatic way >> >> >> And the only comment the above deserves is "gibberish". >> > > > That comment does not help. > Neither does "most strong atheists believe in primary matter in a dogmatic way". John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
