On 16 Jan 2015, at 22:24, John Clark wrote:

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

> Take my definition of God in the Plotinus paper. That is God = the set of Gödel numbers of the true (in the standard model) sentences of arithmetic.

So since according to you it was Christianity who invented the idea that God was a intelligent conscious being I guess all those statues that the Egyptians and Babylonians carved were of the set of Godel numbers that were sentences of arithmetic. It must be tricky making a statue of Godel numbers, but somehow they pulled it off.

I have never said that christians invented the notion of personal god. Only that they have enforced that definition at above the time they bannished the scientific inquiry in the domain.




> Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins has said that "theology is not a field of inquiry, it is little more than erudite noisemaking".

> You don't cite the context,

OK, when Dawkins said that he also said "theology should not be taught or have a department at Oxford where I teach". Thomas Jefferson would have agreed with him, he founded the University of Virginia and insisted that "a professorship of theology should have no place in our institution".

No, problem. It is indeed annoying that some academies allows confessional theologies without allowing the non-confessional one.




> and I am not sure which theologians he has in mind.

I think he was referring to the sort of theologians that breathe.

You should quote me entirely. We were talking about the two main type of theology: the one with some belief in an ontological creation (like Aristotle, christians, atheists, etc.) and those agnostic on this (Plato, greek, indians, all classical universal machines, etc.).



>> Cosmologist Lawrence Krauss also has something interesting to say about theologians and theology: "In regards to theology not being a real subject, I put this challenge out to all theologians. Name me one piece of knowledge theology has contributed to human society in the last 500 years. When I speak to theologians, they always seem to answer “well, what do you mean by knowledge?”, but when I talk to chemists, physicists and medical doctors, they give me concrete facts straight away not this epistemological stuff."

>Which theology?

What a flabby gutless mealymouthed reply, if it's not "what do you mean by knowledge?" its "Which theology?"! Nobody would ask for such a ridiculous "clarification" unless they had nothing better to respond with. If you asked a astronomer to name one piece of knowledge astronomy has contributed to human society in the last 500 years he'd just tell you and would have no need to resort to these silly evasions; he'd name something, lots and lots of things actually.

Sorry, I meant: "which theologian" and is the same question as above.




> What about step 4?

What about the blunders in step 3?

You did not succeed in showing them, and never answered the many refutation of them by many people on the list. In all case you either begged the question, or changed the definitions, or ... accepted the conclusion but adding ad hominem irrelevant unrelated thing of the type "my niece can also prove this", which is why I asked to you what your niece thinks about the next step (4).

Bruno




  John K Clark



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to