On 2/25/2015 1:02 PM, LizR wrote:
Bell's theorem, as Bell made clear, allows realism and locality if the laws of physics operate in a time symmetric manner. All the known laws of physics do, apart from the mechanism underlying neutral kaon decay. Hence it is likely that Bell's theorem doesn't require quantum mystical nonlocal nonreal gobbledegook, it just means accepting something we already strongly suspect to be true (with one minor exception).
That was Vic Stenger's solution to the interpretation of QM, the realized outcome was determined by retro-causality from the future. But that even more transparently the same as inherently random.
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
