On 02 Mar 2015, at 05:33, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If there is something to understand about why X happened, if
there is a reason for it, then X is not random. You've got to think
what "random" means.
> Counter-example: step 3 of UDA.
Bullshit.
Insult at the place all participants told you that they don't see your
point.
> You are still stuck by this?
I always get stuck by gibberish, silly homemade acronyms, and
circular arguments and personal pronouns with no clear referent.
You repeat this, but this is more like public defamation.
Assuming you do have a problem with the part one of UDA, why don't you
study the part 2 where all pronouns are defined in arithmetic through
the use of the second recursion theorem.
Have you heard or seen a critics?
I have played the academical game. There is no problem on that side
(except for rumors).
>>Bell proposed an experiment involving the statistical likelihood
of a photon of unknown polarization passing through a polarizing
filter set at various angles. Using nothing but high school algebra
and trigonometry he found a inequality and proved that if it is
violated then *at least* one of the following must be untrue:
1) Realism: Things, like the photon, have a definite state even
when you haven't measured them, you just don't know what it is.
2) Locality: A photon getting through the filter or getting stopped
by it has something to do with the photon or the filter or both.
3) Determinism: True randomness is impossible.
>there is no non-local influence in the violation of Bell's
inequality.
Maybe, if so then things are not realistic or not deterministic or
both.
Indeed, with "realistic" meaning "one world". But with MWI, physics is
local and deterministic, even symmetrical. Normally, with
computationalism too. I give the method to test this. And I show first
test, and it fits still now.
I think that today *only* elementary arithmetic account for
consciousness, mind and the appearance of a physical reality, with its
sharable and non sharable aspects.
Bruno
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
