> On 2 Mar 2015, at 5:30 pm, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/1/2015 10:26 PM, Kim Jones wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2 Mar 2015, at 2:50 pm, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> But very special type of duplicating machine where the laws of physics 
>>> forbid anyone from observing any of the duplicates that the machine has 
>>> made, so the personal pronoun "you" never causes ambiguity.
>>> 
>>>   John K Clark
>> 
>> So thinking must be tethered to language, then? Ambiguity is some kind of 
>> disease, is it? Aren't you just expressing your distaste for such things? If 
>> you are so infatuated with things the way they are in this boondocks of the 
>> Multiverse then you will never get your head around the full implications of 
>> MWI. Language is not designed to deal with the ambiguity that is woven into 
>> the fabric of reality (you bloody boofhead.) That's why you have to have the 
>> maths for it, man.
> 
> Math is just language made (relatively) precise in it's declarative mode.
> 
> Brent


Thank The Empty Set for that!


K





> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to