> On 23 Mar 2015, at 3:36 pm, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 3/22/2015 8:55 PM, Kim Jones wrote:
>>> But Bruno is only explicating how there can be an objectively determinsitic
>>> process that *necessarily* produces a subjectively uncertain outcome.
>>
>>
>> Yes. Clark has to accept the necessary nature of FPI to be in aosition to go
>> on. Understanding step 3 entails understanding that the FPI is purest
>> indeterminacy at the heart of a deterministic universe. He never will.
>> That's where he's scared. It's too much for him to suppose that some things
>> are truly random.
>
> But he does admit that; he even asserts it. And he also says he thinks MWI
> is right.
>
> Brent
Must have been away that day. So, in your view, what is his problem? Is it
possible to put it in one, maybe two sentences? Only because I think the time
has come to be very certain about this.
K
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
