On 3/22/2015 10:40 PM, Kim Jones wrote:
On 23 Mar 2015, at 3:36 pm, meekerdb <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 3/22/2015 8:55 PM, Kim Jones wrote:
But Bruno is only explicating how there can be an objectively determinsitic process
that *necessarily* produces a subjectively uncertain outcome.
Yes. Clark has to accept the necessary nature of FPI to be in aosition to go on.
Understanding step 3 entails understanding that the FPI is purest indeterminacy at the
heart of a deterministic universe. He never will. That's where he's scared. It's too
much for him to suppose that some things are truly random.
But he does admit that; he even asserts it. And he also says he thinks MWI is
right.
Brent
Must have been away that day. So, in your view, what is his problem? Is it possible to
put it in one, maybe two sentences?
Dunno. Originally I think he didn't considered first-person-indeterminancy a semantic
trick and didn't recognize it was implicit in MWI. Once having rejected it, he's just
been defensive and raised specious objections.
Brent
Only because I think the time has come to be very certain about this.
K
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything
List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
