Telmo Menezes wrote:


On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Bruce Kellett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    meekerdb wrote:

        On 5/15/2015 10:29 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:


            The AI that I envisage will probably be based on a learning
            program of some sort, that will have to learn in much the
            same way as an infant human learns. I doubt that we will
            ever be able to create an AI that is essentially an
            intelligent adult human when it is first turned on.


        I agree with that, but once an AI is realized it will be
        possible to copy it.  And if it's digital it will be possible to
        implement it using different hardware.  If it's not digital, it
        will (in principle) be able to implement it arbitrarily closely
        with a digital device.  And we will have the same question -
        what is that makes that hardware device conscious?  I don't see
        any plausible answer except "Running the program it instantiates."


    But that does not imply that consciousness is itself a computation.
    There is not some subroutine in your AI the is labelled "this
    subroutine computes consciousness". Consciousness is a function of
    the whole functioning system, not of some particular feature. That
    is why I think identifying consciousness with computation is in fact
    adding some additional magic to the machine.


So you don't believe that performing the same computations that your brain does in another substrate will produce a copy of your mind? If you don't believe that, then you must believe in some unknown property of matter (magic?). If you do, then you believe that consciousness supervenes on computation. Consciousness arose in nature by a process of natural evolution.

How do you know that?
Proto-consciousness gave some evolutionary advantage, so it grew and
    developed.

How do you know that?
Nature did not at some point add the fact that it was a computation, and then it suddenly become conscious.
Of course not. Nobody claims that.
Consciousness is a computation only in the trivial sense that any
    physical process can be regarded as a computation, or mapping taking
    some input to some output. There is not some special, magical class
    of computations that are unique to consciousness. Consciousness is
    an evolved bulk property, not just one specific feature of that bulk.

How do you know it's evolved?

Are you seriously going to argue that homo sapiens did *not* arise by a process of natural selection, aka evolution?

Bruce

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to