On 21 Jun 2015, at 19:55, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/21/2015 8:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Z is what the machine can say about the []p & <>t points of view
(like the bet that you will have coffee in the modified step 3
protocol).[]coffee means you get coffee in all consistent
extensions (which in this protocol are W and M), and <>t is the
explicit conditioning that there is at least one consistent
extension, which does not follow from []p due to incompleteness.
You can see that []p & <>t is a weakening of the []p & p move.
Incompleteness forces the machine to provides different logics for
those nuances.
I don't understand this use of "consistent". At first I thought it
meant logical consistency, i.e. not proving false.
That is what I mean.
But in the above you use it as though it meant something like
nomologically consistent.
I don't see why. I use the completeness theorem. A theory/machine is
consistent iff it admits a model.
To be consistent = having a "reality" satisfying or verifying the
beliefs.
Bruno
PS I will have to go. Some other posts could be commented tomorrow.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
