On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I confess that I had never heard of the "Closer Continuer Theory" until >> today, so I typed it into Google and read the first thing that came up. >> http://www2.drury.edu/cpanza/continuer-theory.html >> > > >A quick glance at this indicates that it is not a very good or clear > exposition of the closest continuer theory. You should look at the original > sources. > That doesn't sound like a good idea because the time I take looking at the original source would be time not spent at looking at something else. Perhaps the "Closer Continuer Theory" is really brilliant and Google just made a mistake in listing the brain dead dumb site I looked at as being the best, but it's not very likely. > > In any case, we can't actually duplicate people, so we can't perform > experiments on this. That's true we can't duplicate people, yet, but it's not like faster than light travel, there is nothing in the laws of physics that would prevent it. As far as we know no new scientific discoveries would be required to duplicate people, just vastly improved engineering; instead new scientific discoveries would be required to forbid it. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
