John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 Bruce Kellett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > I confess that I had never heard of the "Closer Continuer
Theory" until today, so I typed it into Google and read the
first thing that came up.
http://www2.drury.edu/cpanza/continuer-theory.html
>A quick glance at this indicates that it is not a very good or
clear exposition of the closest continuer theory. You should look at
the original sources.
That doesn't sound like a good idea because the time I take looking at
the original source would be time not spent at looking at something
else. Perhaps the "Closer Continuer Theory" is really brilliant and
Google just made a mistake in listing the brain dead dumb site I looked
at as being the best, but it's not very likely.
Google comes up with 'brain dead dumb sites' more often than you might like.
Bruce
> In any case, we can't actually duplicate people, so we can't
perform experiments on this.
That's true we can't duplicate people, yet, but it's not like faster
than light travel, there is nothing in the laws of physics that would
prevent it. As far as we know no new scientific discoveries would be
required to duplicate people, just vastly improved engineering; instead
new scientific discoveries would be required to forbid it.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
