On 06 Oct 2015, at 16:23, John Clark wrote:


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015  Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

​> ​John Clark agrees implicitly with the fact that a computation is not a physical notion,

​No, John Clark does not agree with that.​

Then your earlier explanation of what is computation in "physical computation" is senseless.



​> ​because he defines physical computation by a computation done in physics.

​Because John Clark can find no evidence that ​computation NOT done in physics exists, ​

This shows that you have no knowledge of computer science and its history. Computation and computability have been discovered by mathematicians and they don't use any physical assumptions.





and INTEL can't find any evidence for it either.

INTEL is interested in physical computation, but they have a good idea of what a computation is so as to implement them in a physical way.



The only reason John Clark talks about "physical computation​ "​​ and not just "computation" is that unlike John Clark ​ Bruno Marchal ​thinks there is a type of computation that isn't physical.

It is not me. It is everybody in the field. Just open any book on that subject. Avoid books written by physicalist metaphysician of course (like Deutsch in FOR, for example). At least Deutsch agrees that he is in opposition with *all* mathematicians and computer scientists on this.

Bruno







​
 John K Clark







On 05 Oct 2015, at 00:52, Kim Jones wrote:



On 1 Oct 2015, at 3:25 AM, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote:

When I say "physical computation" ​ and you demand a definition of that and when I respond with "a computation done with physics" and you demand a definition of that too then I believe it is perfectly acceptable for me to either get off the silly definition merry-go- round or to demand a definition of my own, a definition of definition.

You are here painting yourself with a very fine brush as what you are. An academic. A useless bloody argumentative broom handle-up-the- arse straighto from the planet Dork. You are out to win argument only, not boldly explore consequences of interesting ideas. That is beyond you; you are a mental midget; the equivalent of someone who thinks its really smart to shoot a giraffe or a lion and then pose for a photo against the carcass. You just love it when people engage with you at all over anything at all because this allows you to indulge in this very sporting activity favourite. You are sick. This list might have moved on from this ridiculous bottleneck years ago but for you. There used to be a lively exchange of ideas going on here.

Academic? No need to insult people. The only thing which matters is that his argument are invalid. Not all academic are invalid when thinking on this subject, and very often non-academic can be invalid, which is normal as the TOE has to be highly counter- intuitive if it can manage both mind and matter, as the platonist understood well when creating theology, math and physics.

Note that here John Clark agrees implicitly with the fact that a computation is not a physical notion, because he defines physical computation by a computation done in physics. So he lost the point. Unfortunately we can expect the usual self-deny and the handwaving.

Bruno




Kim

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to