> On 6 Oct 2015, at 8:34 pm, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Note that here John Clark agrees implicitly with the fact that a computation > is not a physical notion, because he defines physical computation by a > computation done in physics. So he lost the point. Unfortunately we can > expect the usual self-deny and the handwaving. > > Bruno
Bruno - he is never ever going to admit it. Even now you are predicting above that he won’t admit it. So what really is going on here? Have either of you two noticed yet how there is really only the two of you left in this conversation? Does that suggest anything? Insults aside, I don’t honestly see the point of this any more. I have never seen so much dancing up and down on one spot over anything in my life. It really is starting to look like neither can let the other sign-off on it. It is simply not true that he who has the last word has the final word. Some things can be put aside “to come back to later"….in addition, I recall you saying several eons ago that you would no longer respond to JC unless he got beyond Step 3. Cheers, Kim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
