On 8/2/2016 3:29 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2016, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On 8/2/2016 6:15 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: It's not that it can't, but rather that it doesn't, and if it does then that would require some extra physical explanation, a radio link between brains or something. That's what I mean by illegitimately appealing to physics while claiming that physics must be derived from computation of consciousness. Whatever theory we propose must be consistent with observation.
But, "if it does then*/that would require some extra physical explanation/*, a radio link between brains or something." Is not an observation, it's an assumption that all information transfer must be physical.
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
