On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> John Clark has no need to precisely define the word "you" because John >> Clark has no need to use that or any other personal pronoun to explain John >> Clark's ideas but instead can simply >> >> use a proper noun. By contrast Bruno Marchal can not do that because the >> inherent ambiguity the word "you" will always have if a "you" duplicating >> machine is going to be used >> >> on "you" >> >> in the future is the only thing that disguises the underlying >> >> silliness of Bruno Marchal's ideas. >> >> >> > > I can do that, I did do that, and you did not answer. I let you find the > post. > Ah yes that mythical magical post that you've been talking about for years, the wonderful post where you logically refute all my points and make your theory crystal clear with no circularity or ambiguity, the post that is, unfortunately, as hard to find as the Loch Ness Monster, unicorns, or the pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
