On 7/15/2017 1:26 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
We, the universal machines, are distributed in an infinity of
(arithmetical) computations below our substitution level on which our
First Person experience is undetermined, and the laws to predict the
observable must be given by a statistic on all computations, or it
needs to invoke some metaphysical entity, be it Matter or God, doing a
magical (non Turing emulable nor FPI recoverable) selection. That
entails a "many computations" view of reality, and the quantum logical
aspect of Nature is intuitively explained already.
Now, why negative amplitude of probability? This remains
counter-intuitive, but is explained by the fact that the statistic are
not on the 3p representational bodies in arithmetic, but on the 1p
views, which necessitate to be defined by machine-self-reference. In
that case, the non intuitive matter features are recovered by the
nonintuitive logic of self-reference and its 1p variants, and indeed,
we get a quantum logic which makes us expect a unique measure. It
obeys, up to now at least, everything needed to have those negative
probability amplitudes, as required.
That's interesting; but I don't see that it follows. How do you get
negative probabilities in your theory and what is this "statistic on all
computations"?
Please explain.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
