On 14/08/2017 2:32 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 14 August 2017 at 14:15, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The point, as I see it, is that if, after duplication, the copies
can communicate, and they agree that they both have psychological
continuity with the original person, and that, consequently, the
original person saw both cities/results.
If they could communicate after duplication, they would agree that
they both have psychological continuity with the original person, but
why would they agree that the original person saw both cities or
results? This seems to be the same point if dispute. I would feel
exactly the same whether my copy was in the next street, the next
galaxy or the next universe, and I would have exactly the same
expectations about the future if I were to undergo duplication again.
That is only the case if you choose to ignore a large part of the
evidence available to you. In exclusively concentrating on a closed 1p
view after duplication, you are inconsistent with the fact that you used
3p information about the protocol before duplication. Why refuse to use
this 3p (or 2p if you talk to you doppelganger in person) information
after duplication?
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
