On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 at 3:08 pm, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 14/08/2017 2:32 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > On 14 August 2017 at 14:15, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The point, as I see it, is that if, after duplication, the copies can >> communicate, and they agree that they both have psychological continuity >> with the original person, and that, consequently, the original person saw >> both cities/results. >> > > If they could communicate after duplication, they would agree that they > both have psychological continuity with the original person, but why would > they agree that the original person saw both cities or results? This seems > to be the same point if dispute. I would feel exactly the same whether my > copy was in the next street, the next galaxy or the next universe, and I > would have exactly the same expectations about the future if I were to > undergo duplication again. > > > > That is only the case if you choose to ignore a large part of the evidence > available to you. In exclusively concentrating on a closed 1p view after > duplication, you are inconsistent with the fact that you used 3p > information about the protocol before duplication. Why refuse to use this > 3p (or 2p if you talk to you doppelganger in person) information after > duplication? > By what process would the 3p information make me feel differently about myself? > -- Stathis Papaioannou -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
