On 14/08/2017 4:20 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 at 3:08 pm, Bruce Kellett
<bhkell...@optusnet.com.au <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:
On 14/08/2017 2:32 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 14 August 2017 at 14:15, Bruce Kellett
<bhkell...@optusnet.com.au <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>>
wrote:
The point, as I see it, is that if, after duplication, the
copies can communicate, and they agree that they both have
psychological continuity with the original person, and that,
consequently, the original person saw both cities/results.
If they could communicate after duplication, they would agree
that they both have psychological continuity with the original
person, but why would they agree that the original person saw
both cities or results? This seems to be the same point if
dispute. I would feel exactly the same whether my copy was in the
next street, the next galaxy or the next universe, and I would
have exactly the same expectations about the future if I were to
undergo duplication again.
That is only the case if you choose to ignore a large part of the
evidence available to you. In exclusively concentrating on a
closed 1p view after duplication, you are inconsistent with the
fact that you used 3p information about the protocol before
duplication. Why refuse to use this 3p (or 2p if you talk to you
doppelganger in person) information after duplication?
By what process would the 3p information make me feel differently
about myself?
I don't know. How does any knowledge from outside make you feel
differently about yourself?
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.