On 14/08/2017 4:20 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 at 3:08 pm, Bruce Kellett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On 14/08/2017 2:32 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:On 14 August 2017 at 14:15, Bruce Kellett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The point, as I see it, is that if, after duplication, the copies can communicate, and they agree that they both have psychological continuity with the original person, and that, consequently, the original person saw both cities/results. If they could communicate after duplication, they would agree that they both have psychological continuity with the original person, but why would they agree that the original person saw both cities or results? This seems to be the same point if dispute. I would feel exactly the same whether my copy was in the next street, the next galaxy or the next universe, and I would have exactly the same expectations about the future if I were to undergo duplication again.That is only the case if you choose to ignore a large part of the evidence available to you. In exclusively concentrating on a closed 1p view after duplication, you are inconsistent with the fact that you used 3p information about the protocol before duplication. Why refuse to use this 3p (or 2p if you talk to you doppelganger in person) information after duplication?By what process would the 3p information make me feel differently about myself?
I don't know. How does any knowledge from outside make you feel differently about yourself?
Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
