On 18 Aug 2017, at 18:02, John Clark wrote:

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

​> ​If we were able to say in "Helsinki" which one the "1- you" ​ [...]​

 I tire of your homemade baby talk. ​

Insult = lack of argument.

Of course, if the 1p-3p distinction is baby talk, we can doubt you will ever understand.




​> ​The pronoun used in Helsinki makes perfect sense

​Today in in Helsinki the personal pronoun makes​ ​perfect sense​ ​to everyone from every point of view, but extrapolated into tomorrow and into 2 different cities it makes no sense to anyone from any point of view.

Unless we make clear that we assume computationalism, and that we distinguish the 1p and the 3p.





​>> ​But there is no way for ANYONE to EVER know if the prediction "I will see Moscow" was correct or not.

​> ​There will be if ANYONE accompanies the candidate. I go in the cut-box, in Helsinki, with you. You predict "Washington", say. You push on the button. I open the door, from inside thus. And we both see "Moscow". You were wrong.

​All that is real nice but let me repeat the question that I have asked 999 times and you have dodged 999 time: What one and only one city will I see tomorrow?

Washington or Moscow, each with a probability of 1/2.



If you can't answer that question with the name of one and only one city then I don't want to hear any more talk about a "bet" because there is none. ​

​> ​Nobody will see 50% of Moscow, and nobody will see, in the first person sense, two cities.

​That's because there is no such thing as THE ​first ​person sense​ in a world that contains "THE ​first person sense​" duplicating machines. ​

That will be refuted by the two copies.




​> ​So you are reasoning like we would have claimed the existence of some 3p indeterminacy, but we claim only that there is an "1p indeterminacy".

​That is incorrect, I never use peepee in my reasoning.​

Which seems to be a technic handy for you to fake to miss the point.


Bruno




​> ​I feel sorry for you

​And that has got to be the most insincere ​phrase in the English language.

​ John K Clark​




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to