On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

> ​>
>>> ​>>​
>>> * ​**But a necessary byproduct of hominid evolved intelligence;*
>>
>>
>> *​>> ​NO! *Byproduct don't evolve anything, especially not consciousness
>> because Evolution can't even see it.
>
>
> ​> ​
> "Byproduct don't evolve anything"?? Where did I say it did?
>

*​"a necessary byproduct of hominid evolved intelligence​"​*


> ​> ​
> Have you been drinking?
>

​No, but you may make me start.​

​

John K Clark​









> ...you can usually keep your answers grammatical.
>
>
>
>> ​*> ​*
>> *otherwise it could be dispensed with.  *
>>
>
> ​You can't dispose of a spandrel, it comes with the territory.  ​
>
>
> You contradict yourself.  "Comes with the territory" = "necessary by
> product".   So if consciousness is a spandrel it's a necessary
> byproduct...which means it's not really a byproduct, it's a feature...just
> not one that selection can act on.
>
>
>
> ​>* ​*
>> *Fine.  But if the roof isn't supported by arches the spandrels don't
>> appear. If intelligence evolves via some other path ​ ​ *
>> *(as in octopuses) or is designed rather than evolved the argument that
>> it will be accompanied by consciousness fails.*
>
>
> If there are many paths to intelligence it is probable that Evolution
> found the simplest,
>
>
> That's laughable.  You must not have looked at cell metabolism.
>
> if only one of those paths leads to consciousness, our path, then it would
> be easier to make a intelligent computer that is conscious than to make a
> intelligent computer that has no consciousness.
>
>
> Maybe.  IF it's easy to copy brain architecture and function.  The
> question is, how will we know if we do.  If we copy brain architecture
> we'll have some reason to think intelligence => consciousness.  But if we
> adopt some other architecture, e.g. a mixed neural net + von Neumann, we'll
> be in the dark as to whether it's conscious.  My inclination would be ask
> it.  If it's intelligent enough to lie I'm willing to give it ethical
> status.
>
> Brent
>
> As I've said
> ​,​
> you've got to make a educated guess and place a bet. And the stakes are
> very high.
>
> ​John K Clark​
>
>
>
>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to