On 6/12/2018 10:51 AM, [email protected] wrote:
On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 5:28:05 PM UTC, Brent wrote: On 6/12/2018 1:01 AM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote:*The bottom line, or if you will, the 800 pound elephant in the room, is that the macro entities which are included in the seminal superposition of states for decoherence, are in thermal equilibrium with their environments, constantly emitting and absorbing photons -- before, during, and after their inclusions in said state. Thus, they never are, nor can they ever be isolated from their environments, making this seminal superposition of states an illusory construction. AG *Don't you see that you're just repeating the old debate about the Heisenberg cut. Where's the line between micro and macro? You think simplistically by considering only really big stuff as classical and ignoring the fact that there is a whole range of sizes. Brent *I have NOT. I have stated several times that some macro objects are EXCLUDED, such as those with well defined deBroglie wave lengths like billiard balls and Buckyballs. For the vast set of applicable macro objects, my claim remains; that there is a fallacy of including these objects in superpositions, as doing so leads to a foolish conclusion; MW. AG*
You're missing the point that in every QM experiment there's a step where micro goes to macro. It doesn't solve anything to rant about de Broglie wavelengths of cats.
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
