On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 8:20:00 PM UTC, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 6:13:04 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/12/2018 10:51 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 5:28:05 PM UTC, Brent wrote: 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/12/2018 1:01 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>> *The bottom line, or if you will, the 800 pound elephant in the room, is 
>>> that the macro entities which are included in the seminal superposition of 
>>> states for decoherence, are in thermal equilibrium with their environments, 
>>> constantly emitting and absorbing photons -- before, during, and after 
>>> their inclusions in said state. Thus, they never are, nor can they ever be 
>>> isolated from their environments, making this seminal superposition of 
>>> states an illusory construction. AG *
>>>
>>>
>>> Don't you see that you're just repeating the old debate about the 
>>> Heisenberg cut.  Where's the line between micro and macro?  You think 
>>> simplistically by considering only really big stuff as classical and 
>>> ignoring the fact that there is a whole range of sizes.
>>>
>>> Brent
>>>
>>
>> * I have NOT. I have stated several times that some macro objects are 
>> EXCLUDED, such as those with well defined deBroglie wave lengths like 
>> billiard balls and Buckyballs. For the vast set of applicable macro 
>> objects, my claim remains; that there is a fallacy of including these 
>> objects in superpositions, as doing so leads to a foolish conclusion; MW. 
>> AG*
>>
>>
>> You're missing the point that in every QM experiment there's a step where 
>> micro goes to macro. It doesn't solve anything to rant about de Broglie 
>> wavelengths of cats.
>>
>> Brent
>>
>
> *Before the Masters of the Universe included Observers, Instruments, and 
> Environments in the wf's, did quantum experiments imply MW (excluding the 
> MWI based on the SWE)?  AG*
>

*As I see it, decoherence theory "solves" the cat paradox by assuming 
(falsely) that the cat can be isolated and then decoheres with extreme 
rapidly, But then we're still left with a cat which is alive and dead 
simulteously, but only for a very very short duration.  So No, I don't see 
this as a solution. CMIIAW. AG*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to