On 6/12/2018 3:02 PM, [email protected] wrote:



On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 8:20:00 PM UTC, [email protected] wrote:



    On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 6:13:04 PM UTC, Brent wrote:



        On 6/12/2018 10:51 AM, [email protected] wrote:


        On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 5:28:05 PM UTC, Brent wrote:



            On 6/12/2018 1:01 AM, [email protected] wrote:
            *The bottom line, or if you will, the 800 pound elephant
            in the room, is that the macro entities which are
            included in the seminal superposition of states for
            decoherence, are in thermal equilibrium with their
            environments, constantly emitting and absorbing photons
            -- before, during, and after their inclusions in said
            state. Thus, they never are, nor can they ever be
            isolated from their environments, making this seminal
            superposition of states an illusory construction. AG *

            Don't you see that you're just repeating the old debate
            about the Heisenberg cut.  Where's the line between micro
            and macro?  You think simplistically by considering only
            really big stuff as classical and ignoring the fact that
            there is a whole range of sizes.

            Brent

        *
        I have NOT. I have stated several times that some macro
        objects are EXCLUDED, such as those with well defined
        deBroglie wave lengths like billiard balls and Buckyballs.
        For the vast set of applicable macro objects, my claim
        remains; that there is a fallacy of including these objects
        in superpositions, as doing so leads to a foolish conclusion;
        MW. AG*

        You're missing the point that in every QM experiment there's a
        step where micro goes to macro. It doesn't solve anything to
        rant about de Broglie wavelengths of cats.

        Brent


    *Before the Masters of the Universe included Observers,
    Instruments, and Environments in the wf's, did quantum experiments
    imply MW (excluding the MWI based on the SWE)?  AG*


*As I see it, decoherence theory "solves" the cat paradox by assuming (falsely) that the cat can be isolated and then decoheres with extreme rapidly, But then we're still left with a cat which is alive and dead simulteously, but only for a very very short duration.  So No, I don't see this as a solution. CMIIAW. AG*

The cat is never isolated (that's a condition you just invented), but that doesn't mean it can't be split into (FAPP) orthogonal states by becoming entangled with the poison gas which is entangled with the radioactive atom which is in a superposition of decayed and not-decayed.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to