> On 9 Mar 2019, at 01:16, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/8/2019 2:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> Why is the probability not 1.0.  Why is there any effect at all in any 
>>> continuation?  Why is experience dependent on physics, if it is just a 
>>> matter of timeless arithmetical relations.
>> Because to get physics you need to be able to make prediction.
> 
> But why do you need to "get physics".  You seem to be arguing backwards from 
> the conclusion you want.  You know you need to get physics to make a 
> prediction, otherwise your theory is useless.  So then you argue that 
> therefore substituting for brain parts is necessary because that makes 
> "getting physics" necessary.

I don’t understand. What do you mean by “substituting brain parts is 
necessary”. It is my working hypothesis. It is the exactly same hypothesis made 
by Darwin, and most scientists since. That physics has to be recovered from 
arithmetic is shown to be a consequence of that theory. And the proofs I have 
given is constructive, so it explains how to recover physics from arithmetic. 
Most of the weirdness of quantum physics becomes indisputable arithmetic facts. 
In fact, the classical, or quasi classical part of physics is far more 
difficult to be derived, but it has still to be derivable, unless Mechanism is 
false (in which case we are back at the start).

Keep in mind that with Mechanism, physicalism is already refuted. With 
physicalism, you need a god to select a computation, or a collection of 
computation, to make a prediction. But if that God exists, you cannot say that 
you survive a digital substitution of the brain *qua computation”. You can 
still say yes to a doctor, invoking the strangest magical abilities of your god 
or another.

If you doubt this, just tell me how A Nature, or a Primary Matter, or any God, 
select the computation which all occurs, are executed in the (sigma_1) 
arithmetical reality.

If you argue that the computation in arithmetic are not real, you again invoke 
your god. The word “real” has to be avoid in science, especially in theology 
when done with the scientific method.

Bruno




> 
> Brent
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to