> On 7 Mar 2019, at 22:20, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/7/2019 9:11 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> On 7 Mar 2019, at 05:48, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/6/2019 10:20 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>> I use mechanism in the sense that if little daemon substitute each piece 
>>>> of my brain, at some resolution level,  by functional digital equivalent, 
>>>> then my consciousness would not notice the difference.
>>> According to your theory, your consciousness is instantiated by the 
>>> computational threads of the universal dovetailer, which exists within 
>>> arithmetic.  So whether a piece of your brain is present, replaced, or 
>>> removed should make no difference to you consciousness.
>> 
>> Proof?
>> 
>> Yes, at first sight, naively, the universal dovetailing predicts white 
>> rabbits, or even white noise. But this is like forgetting the definition of 
>> the subject given (the Gödel-Löbian machines), and the fact that the thread 
>> in the Universal dovetailing is entirely structured by the nuance of 
>> provability imposed by incompleteness.
>> 
>> Then the math shows that we get a quantum logic for the 3p physics, another 
>> quantum logics for the 1p physics, and even (I was wrong in my original 
>> thesis) a quantum logic for the 1p-soul. Plotinus was right on this, the 
>> soul has already a foot in matter, even if that quantum logic is an 
>> intuitionist quantum logic.
>> 
>> If I belong to a normal history, for those arithmetical quantum logic,  
>> where some people decide to remove a piece of my brain, the probability will 
>> be high that I will survive that lobotomic experience in the “continuum” of 
>> continuations which are executed in the sigma_1 arithmetic (equivalent to a 
>> universal dovetailing).
> 
> Why is the probability not 1.0.  Why is there any effect at all in any 
> continuation?  Why is experience dependent on physics, if it is just a matter 
> of timeless arithmetical relations.

Because to get physics you need to be able to make prediction. To get a logic 
of probability, incompleteness forbid to use “[]p” (true in all accessible 
continuations) because there are path to cul-de-sac at each world, so we need 
to explicitly define observation by []p & <>t. That does gives a logic of 
probability in general, and with “[]” = Gödel’s beweisbar, that gives a quantum 
probability calculus, etc.

In general relativity, people also explain the perception of time from a static 
reality. With mechanism, though, we don’t have a block-universe, but a 
block-mindscape, where the mind can be defined by the set of accessible 
computational continuation relatively to a universal machine.

Bruno




> 
> Brent
> 
>> 
>> And mechanism is not my theory. Nor is the G* theology, which is just the 
>> truth theory of all classical Löbian machine, as demonstrate by the work of 
>> Gödel, Löb and Solovay. I have not invented the intensional variants. ([]p & 
>> p) has been discovered by Goldblatt and Boolos, well studied by Artemov. And 
>> yes, I point on the existence of infinitely many others, some crucial to 
>> derive “Matter” from arithmetic in the manner prescribed by Mechanism (or, 
>> actually Neoplatonism).
>> 
>> Bruno
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Brent
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to