On 3/8/2019 2:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Why is the probability not 1.0. Why is there any effect at all in any
continuation? Why is experience dependent on physics, if it is just a matter
of timeless arithmetical relations.
Because to get physics you need to be able to make prediction.
But why do you need to "get physics". You seem to be arguing backwards
from the conclusion you want. You know you need to get physics to make
a prediction, otherwise your theory is useless. So then you argue that
therefore substituting for brain parts is necessary because that makes
"getting physics" necessary.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.