But it has predictions. Is just that it depends what you understand by "predictions" at this point. If you understand something like predicting the masses of particles from physics, then it doesn't make such a prediction. But neither does physics. But on the other hand, it makes predictions like the fact that it explains the retentional passage of time. Husserl described the fact that time has a retentional structure, but he didn't explain why it is like this. In my theory, this is explained. The way it is explained is through the fact that time inherits the quality of self-reference from the Self and the quality of memory from Memory, so each present moment that goes into the past is pushed back into itself as present, therefore obtaining the retentional structure of time as described by Husserl. This is a big thing!
On Wednesday, 17 April 2019 18:36:07 UTC+3, Brent wrote: > > Yes, I understand your ToE is like ideal monism. But it is one thing to > assert it. It is another to derive some predictions from it. > > Brent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
