On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:59 AM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On 5/5/2019 10:30 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:51 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 5/5/2019 7:30 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, May 5, 2019, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/5/2019 5:57 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, May 5, 2019, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/5/2019 3:49 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How do we know other humans are conscious (we don't, we can only
>>>> suspect it).
>>>>
>>>> Why do we suspect other humans are conscious (due to their outwardly
>>>> visible behaviors).
>>>>
>>>> Due to the Church-Turing thesis, we know an appropriately programmed
>>>> computer can replicate any finitely describable behavior.  Therefore a
>>>> person with an appropriately programmed computer, placed in someone's
>>>> skill, and wired into the nervous system of a human could perfectly mimic
>>>> the behaviors, speech patterns, thoughts, skills, of any person you have
>>>> ever met.
>>>>
>>>> Do you dispute any of the above?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It assumes you could violate Holevo's theorem to obtain the necessary
>>>> program.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You could find the program by chance or by iteration (for the purposes
>>> of the thought experiment).
>>>
>>>
>>> In those cases you could never know that you had been successful.
>>>
>>
>>
>> The question wasn't whether or not we would succeed, but given that we
>> know it is possible to succeed, given there ezists a program that could
>> convince you it was your friend, why doubt it is consciousness?
>>
>>
>> I don't think I would doubt it was conscious even if it just acted as
>> intelligent as some stranger.  But note that it would have to be
>> interactive.  So I think Wegner's point is that makes its computations not
>> finitely describable.
>>
>
> Who is Wegner in this context, and what was his point?
>
> I don't see how any computation could be not finitely describable, given
> that any programs can be expressed as a finite integer.
>
>
> This guy, Peter Wegner, that pt referred to indirectly.
> http://www.cse.uconn.edu/~dgoldin/papers/strong-cct.pdf  His point is
> that human consciousness is an interactive program that receives arbitrary
> and unknown inputs from the environment and is modified by those inputs.
> He calls this model a PTM, Persistent Turing Machine, because it keeps a
> memory and doesn't overwrite it.  Of course you can say that whatever the
> environmental input is, it can be included in the TM code, but then it is
> potentially inifinite.
>
>
Even if true, this doesn't preclude the thought experiment I defined, where
the program takes in inputs from the environment via the senses and feeds
those inputs to the program.

Jason


> Brent
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>>
>> Brent
>>
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Brent
>>>
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you encountered a close friend who had to get a computer replacement
>>>> for his brain (e.g. due to an inoperable tumor), and this friend displayed
>>>> perfect mimicry of the behavior prior to the surgery, would you continue to
>>>> tell him he his not conscious, despite his protestations that he is every
>>>> bit as conscious as before?  On what basis would this your claim rest?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some of my friends I'd tell him it was amazing how much smarter he was.
>>>>
>>>> Brent
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 1:33 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Re:  "only certain kinds of matter can be conscious" and "all matter
>>>>> is conscious"
>>>>>
>>>>> I do think the first (human brains at least, and perhaps some
>>>>> non-human brains, from primates to down* the "food-chain").
>>>>>
>>>>> Some think there was no fully or cognitively conscious (only a sensory
>>>>> conscious) human before language. There may be something to that.
>>>>>
>>>>> But not the second (where there is self and self-awareness).  *Rocks
>>>>> are not conscious.* But the idea is that all matter does have some
>>>>> level of *elementary protoconsciousness* in various  types, phases,
>>>>> and configurations of matter. When some matter is combined into certain
>>>>> configurations (like a human brain), these *protopsychical parts* are
>>>>> fused into something conscious.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Do Insects Have Consciousness and Ego?
>>>>> *The brains of insects are similar to a structure in human brains,
>>>>> which could show a rudimentary form of consciousness*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/do-insects-have-consciousness-ego-180958824/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think that societies are conscious, the Earth is conscious,
>>>>> the universe is conscious.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Earth is aware of itself? I don't think so.
>>>>>
>>>>> @philipthrift
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 8:25:26 AM UTC-5, Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You keep trotting out the term "cybernetic delusion" as if it's a
>>>>>> problem. But it's just an assumption I make, that consciousness is
>>>>>> identified with cybernetic dynamics. I'm exploring the consequences of 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> idea, which are compelling IMO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You or anyone else can feel free to adopt or not adopt that
>>>>>> assumption. But it's not a delusion. Calling it that suggests there's a
>>>>>> more correct way to view consciousness. But you haven't been clear about
>>>>>> what that is, vacillating between "only certain kinds of matter can be
>>>>>> conscious" and "all matter is conscious". If you adopt panpsychism, you
>>>>>> fall prey to the cybernetic delusion yourself. And when you don't, *you
>>>>>> fail to explain what privileges certain kinds of matter over others*.
>>>>>> It seems pretty clear to me that there's no principled way to do that...
>>>>>> any explanation of why brains can be conscious but not computers starts 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> sound suspiciously like "spirit" and "soul", in the sense that you're
>>>>>> invoking some property of matter that cannot be detected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Terren
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:57 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 8:30:00 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 9:15 PM 'Cosmin Visan'  <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *> What happens in cases of telepathy is [...]. For example, in
>>>>>>>>> cases of dream telepathy [...] This clearly is a case of dream 
>>>>>>>>> telepathy.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, there was little doubt before but you just made it official, Cosmin
>>>>>>>> Visan is a crackpot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  John K Clark
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Telepathy I doubt pretty bigly, but the cybernetic delusion is a
>>>>>>> really crackpot idea.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @philipthrift
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to