On 5/10/2019 8:17 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
If the theory is to make any sense, any reference to "the
universe" must be consistent with every other reference to "the
universe".
Einstein's paper on special relativity begins with one concept of
time, and by the end of the paper refines it to a more accurate
conception of time. I don't think this is any different. Here we
start with a conventional meaning of "physical universe", and by the
end we show how the reasoning leads to a more refined concept of universe.
The difference is that we don't credence Einstein's theory because of
some argument, we accept it because it made some surprising predictions
which were empirically verified.
Brnet
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/21b74f5c-3e7b-22dc-8695-3e4554977a3e%40verizon.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
