On 5/10/2019 4:36 PM, Jason Resch wrote:


On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:07 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 5/10/2019 8:17 AM, Jason Resch wrote:

        If the theory is to make any sense, any reference to "the
        universe" must be consistent with every other reference to
        "the universe".


    Einstein's paper on special relativity begins with one concept of
    time, and by the end of the paper refines it to a more accurate
    conception of time. I don't think this is any different.  Here we
    start with a conventional meaning of "physical universe", and by
    the end we show how the reasoning leads to a more refined concept
    of universe.

    The difference is that we don't credence Einstein's theory because
    of some argument, we accept it because it made some surprising
    predictions which were empirically verified.


Do you have another theory

Another theory than what?  general relativity?

that can explain why we have:

  * Simple physical laws that are probabilistic

?? Einstein's general realtivity is neither simple nor probabilistic.  But I do have an explanation as to why physical laws are relatively simple (as compared to say geography or history): physicist direct their attention and develop theories about reduced, simple systems.  The rest they leave to geographers and historians.

  * Persistent regularities

What theory explains the existence of regularities?  The weak anthropic principle?

  * An external world that contains the observer

As opposed to an external world that didn't have an observer to be external to?  Or as opposed to an observer who is not contained in anything to observe?


  * Inter-subjective agreement on physical laws

Physical laws are invented to describe and predict observations on which there is intersubjective agreement.


  * Subjective immortality
  * Simple initial conditions
  * Observation of a universe that evolves in time
  * Observation of a universe with an absolute beginning in time

Facts not in evidence, as my lawyer would say.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/99c730bb-9c54-3d63-f887-30b81b4f18d0%40verizon.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to