On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 3:58:17 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > Now that does not make sense to me, but this is because your ontology is > unclear for me. Your text is not quite helpful, and I might ask you to > formalise your ontology and perhaps the phenomenology too, to make precise > sense on this. It is unclear how you would test experimentally such > statements. >
You "might" ask him. I would advise against such a move as he may reverse the question and ask you something equivalent. E.g. he may ask: Can you show me Bell's theorem in the combinator thread or using any equivalent universal machinery? Just to make precise sense of things? To see in action how to test such statements, ontologies, phenomenologies experimentally, in a formal setting of your choice, beyond retrodiction on others' work? PGC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8bd50efc-8efa-4a21-a0dc-823518a2432f%40googlegroups.com.
