On Friday, June 21, 2019 at 12:56:59 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 20 Jun 2019, at 17:20, PGC <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 3:58:17 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> >> Now that does not make sense to me, but this is because your ontology is >> unclear for me. Your text is not quite helpful, and I might ask you to >> formalise your ontology and perhaps the phenomenology too, to make precise >> sense on this. It is unclear how you would test experimentally such >> statements. >> > > You "might" ask him. I would advise against such a move as he may reverse > the question and ask you something equivalent. E.g. he may ask: Can you > show me Bell's theorem in the combinator thread or using any equivalent > universal machinery? Just to make precise sense of things? To see in action > how to test such statements, ontologies, phenomenologies experimentally, in > a formal setting of your choice, beyond retrodiction on others' work? PGC > > > This is done in detail in my papers (and longer test). > > If you are interested, I can expand this here. >
You demand formal precision from other's claims and you "read my papers" me without titles, pages, or exact references? Nobody has to give you permission to expand, you do so or you don't. Let's see Bell in combinators then and as many longer tests as you like. Since it's all done and obvious, it's a simple copy and paste matter. PGC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/aea32e3c-111f-4820-ae85-5d0b1d419e06%40googlegroups.com.
