> On 18 Jul 2019, at 22:08, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> >> A Turing Machine is compatible with both pure mathematics and pure 
> >> physics, but Lambda Calculus is compatible only with pure mathematics. 
>  
> Why?
> 
> Ask Alonzo Church the inventor of Lambda Calculus who admitted it's true, and 
> so did Godel. 

True for the pedagogy, false for the conceptual and mathematical complexity.


>  
> > The so called LISP machine implements combinators and lambda expression
> 
> LISP machines were just Turing Machines


Nonsense.




> that incorporated common subroutines used in the LISP language in HARDWARE to 
> enabled them to run faster, but by the early 1990's microprocessors had 
> gotten so fast that cheap home computers ran faster than any dedicated LISP 
> machine and that's why nobody makes them anymore. 
>  
> >>I am telling you that matter is needed to make that happen, in this case 
> >>the matter in the microprocessor of the computer that is running the video 
> >>game that is using Bitcoins as money. 
> 
> > But why? 
> 
> Why what?

Why assuming primary matter, what is it, and how would that make a computation 
more real than others?



> 
> > Why to make that assumption,
> 
> What assumption?

The assumption that there is a physical universe, and that in metaphysics we 
have to make that assumption.

Why do you assume that matter is not explainable from non physical notion?



> 
>   >> Consciousness? What the hell does that have to do with the price of 
> eggs?  
> 
> > You are the one saying that we need matter for a computation to happen
> 
> Because every computation ever observed in the history of the world has 
> required matter.

We have to explain observable by using “all computation”, when we assumed 
mechanism, which is what make your argument circular here.

I stop here, because I have already answered all other comments in other posts.

Bruno 



> 
> > (and I infer “to support genuine consciousness”).
> 
> And every time in the history of the world a change in consciousness resulted 
> in a change in the physical state of a brain and a change in the physical 
> state of a brain resulted in a change in consciousness.
> 
> > If not, then it is even more weird why you want for matter, given that the 
> > computation are realised in arithmetic,
> 
> And not once in the history of the world has anyone observed a computation 
> being made in nothing but a change in arithmetic. In fact nobody has ever 
> observed a change in arithmetic period.
> 
>> >>>  the whole video game is executed through pure number relation
>> 
> >> Incorrect.  The whole video game is executed through voltage differences 
> >> in the microprocessor.
> 
> > You can implement it,
> 
> You've got it backwards. The numbers don't emulate the voltages in the 
> microprocessor, the voltages in the microprocessor emulate the numbers.
> 
> >> We can use the language of mathematics to help us understand how those 
> >> voltage differences effect each other, and we can if we wish interpret 
> >> those voltage differences as numbers.
> 
> > In your theory which assumes a physical universe.
> 
> The only thing I assume is that if something works then it works and if 
> something doesn't work then it doesn't work. Making calculations with the 
> help of matter works, making calculations without matter doesn't work.
> 
> And that is your cue to refute what I just said by referring to a textbook 
> that will never be able to calculate 2+2.
>> > See the combinator thread for a precise disproof of this.
> 
> Ah yes, that legendary post
>  
> >Ad hominem.  Boring.
> 
> What's boring is your referring to posts that don't exist, your constant 
> whining and using that incredibly pompous Latin phrase. 
> 
> >> post of yours that plugs all the holes in your theory and proves that 
> >> everything I've said is wrong, the post that you've been talking about for 
> >> the better part of a decade, the post that NOBODY HAS EVER SEEN.
> 
> > I just said that I have proven that the giving of the lambda expressions 
> > [x][y]x (which does the same job as K) and [x][y][z]xz(yz) 
> 
> I agree, "[x][y]x" does indeed *do* the same job as "K) and [x][y][z]xz(yz)" 
> because both ASCII sequences *do* precisely NOTHING and 0=0 so they both *do* 
> exactly the same thing. Nothing.
> 
> >>The logical operation of every computer ever made can be reduced to a 
> >>Turing Machine.
> 
> >True but irrelevant.
> 
> How in the world is that fact irrelevant?!
> 
> > Actually it makes my point, but usually, thanks to our physical laws (and 
> > transistors) the boolean operation will be used to simulate a Turing 
> > machines.
> 
> Boolean operations don't simulate Turing Machines, Turing Machines simulate 
> Boolean operations.
> 
> >> Ironically to rebut my accusation that you keep changing the meaning of 
> >> "Aristotle theology" you introduced the concept of  "Aristotle's second 
> >> God"; I've never heard anybody mention that before, but I admit you know 
> >> more about Greek silly ideas than I do. 
> 
> > The first God is Aristotle first mover it is [...]
> 
> Bruno, I did ask you not to tell me, I've given up keeping track of your 
> constantly mutating definitions of common words and invented phrases and 
> acronyms used by nobody but you. 
> 
> John K Clark    
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2EDrpjXzYoKKGjJkFytDAy2oRRPUktDMmgH2ZRs6WW_A%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2EDrpjXzYoKKGjJkFytDAy2oRRPUktDMmgH2ZRs6WW_A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/45294214-2FD7-4DBD-814E-8F27583DA3CF%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to