On 8/26/2019 7:44 PM, Jason Resch wrote:


On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:33 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 8/26/2019 6:13 PM, Jason Resch wrote:

                    What does "distinct" mean in that?  It's a
                    distinction you make because
                    you can think of a brain and processes of the
                    brain as separate.  Just
                    like you can think of an automobile plant as
                    distinct from the steps
                    required to make a car. But that doesn't mean
                    that a car can be made
                    without any physical process.


                It is distinct in the sense that bits are
                different from electrical voltages or scribbles on
                paper.

                Yes and insurance is different from cash.  So
                what?  A bit is just a physical thing that you
                choose to regard purely in terms of its
                computational relations...we calll the
                "abstractions" for a reason.


            Under your own definition of abstraction above, there
            is a distinction between a mind and a brain.  There's
            not an identity relation between the two, as one
            discards unnecessary details.

            "Unnecessary" to what?


        The specification of the mind.

        But you don't know that.  You're merely assuming that a mind
        can be specified without reference to a physical world in
        which it exists.


    If functionalism is true, and if it's description is not
    infinite, then it can be.


    But one of the specifications of the mind may be that it's
    physically instantiated.  Otherwise it couldn't perceive or act.


You agreed that the computation would act the same regardless of the source of the information.  So I don't know why you think it would not act.

The mind needs a body to act.  The mind is a process in the brain or computer.  As a process per se it can't act.

Brent

Also, you agreed "physical" is just a relation between an observer and a structure which might be mathematical.  So what makes any Turing machine any more or less capable than any other for processing an observer?

Jason

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUh-fjxtAKPy6LsZ4B2wriO7%2B2PY9%2BAfgF8F%2BAqreJ8xvQ%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUh-fjxtAKPy6LsZ4B2wriO7%2B2PY9%2BAfgF8F%2BAqreJ8xvQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/cb47bfe8-dfc1-23f8-a99b-84de4f055195%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to