> On 3 Sep 2019, at 10:55, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Nice find, but Michael Forrest's paper should have related something more > naturally plausible: > > cosmopsychism > - > https://aeon.co/essays/cosmopsychism-explains-why-the-universe-is-fine-tuned-for-life > > <https://aeon.co/essays/cosmopsychism-explains-why-the-universe-is-fine-tuned-for-life> > > At least we know consciousness exists in at least one place > (inside our skulls, though there are deniers) > - https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/03/13/the-consciousness-deniers/ > <https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/03/13/the-consciousness-deniers/> > > but no evidence of God has ever been observed.
It does not make sense to say that my consciousness is located in my skull, no more than to say that the number 2 is in my fridge, even if exactly two bottles of fresh water is there. Then, how do you define God? I agree that there is no evidence for Santa Klaus, but I would say that with the original conception of God given by Plato (which is simply the fundamental truth, with the insight that it is above us), there are some evidence, ...making it for me the second thing close to the indubitable. Now, I do think that there are no evidences for a primary physical universe. And there are evidence that it does not exist: mainly that it can be proven that that it is incompatible with Mechanism, for which we do have evidences, like the evidence for evolution, molecular biology, or the computability of all known Lagrangian or Hamiltonian (quantum or not). Bruno > > @philipthrift > > On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 7:28:04 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: > And so we have! > > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294721340_God_is_a_Vacuum_Fluctuation > > <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294721340_God_is_a_Vacuum_Fluctuation> > > Nyuck Nyuck Nyuck! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Philip Thrift <[email protected] <javascript:>> > To: Everything List <[email protected] <javascript:>> > Sent: Mon, Sep 2, 2019 2:54 am > Subject: Re: Quantum Foam > > > > On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 8:34:06 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > > This has gotten a bit off track from quantum fluctuations. > > LC > > > > The originating Topic 'quantum foam' became 'religious myth'. > > > @philipthrift > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8a3cb209-3708-46ac-b949-1df2090fdc7e%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8a3cb209-3708-46ac-b949-1df2090fdc7e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/AF03732F-9405-41B6-B2B2-00234136114E%40ulb.ac.be.
