> On 29 Oct 2019, at 19:01, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 10/29/2019 4:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> Obviously. But my point is that if 2 does not make sense, 2 electrons does >> not make sense either, and the Big Bang is no more something that we can >> today considered as real before us. > > "2" and "Big Bang" are descriptive elements in our theories.
They are supposed to refer to things which we believe to be independent of us and of our theories. > Before us there is no one to hold the theories, no one to stand in the > relation of "making sense to”. Does this prevents us to believe that there was a big-bang before the humans? Or that 67 is odd, even in absence of human? If it does, I’m afraid we are on a slope toward anthropocentrism if not solipsism. Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8228ca99-daf4-1bd1-0fb9-cd81dd246051%40verizon.net. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6EEA0531-E2F6-4DE0-9BA0-54397968C439%40ulb.ac.be.
